Department of Computer Science
The University of Texas at El Paso
Accreditation Materials
July 2, 2001
Preface
This volume contains two separate documents:
1. A copy of the CSAC Program Evaluation Audit, with pointers to the relevant sections of the department’s Questionnaire for Review of the Computer Science Program
2.
The
department’s Questionnaire for Review of the
Computer Science Program
The department’s self-study and the pointers
for the audit were prepared by David Novick, Rose Baquera, Ray Bell, Brian
d’Auriol, Frank Fernandez, Ann Gates, Vladik Kreinovich, Luc Longpré, Steve
Roach, Rolfe Sassenfeld, Pat Teller, and Karen Ward. Data presented in the
report were collected by the department faculty, the college of engineering,
and the university’s Center for Institutional Evaluation, Research and
Planning (CIERP).
CSAC PROGRAM EVALUATION AUDIT
January 2000 Criteria
|
Institution |
The University of Texas at El Paso |
|
Visit Dates |
October 28-30, 2001 |
|
Program Name |
Computer Science |
|
Team Chair |
|
|
ABBREVIATIONS RELATED TO INTENTS AND STANDARDS |
|
|
|
|
Use S to denote a standard is SATISFIED -- default. |
|
|
|
|
Use C to indicate there is a CONCERN about a standard. |
|
|
|
|
Use NS to denote a standard is NOT SATISFIED. |
|
|
|
|
Use AI for ALTERNATIVE IMPLEMENTATION of a standard. |
|
|
|
|
Use D to denote DEFICIENCY for an intent; i.e., an intent is not met. |
|
I |
Objectives
and Assessments |
|
|
|
|
Intent |
The program has
documented, measurable objectives, including expected outcomes for
graduates. The program regularly
assesses its progress against its objectives and uses the results of the
assessments to identify program improvements and to modify the program’s
objectives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Has the Intent
of the category been met? |
|
|
|
|
|
Standards |
|
|
|
|
1 |
The program must
have documented, measurable objectives. |
Section I-A: Objectives and Assessments |
||
|
2 |
The program’s
objectives must include expected outcomes for graduating students. |
|||
|
3 |
Data relative to
the objectives must be routinely collected and documented, and used in
program assessments. |
Section I-B: Implementation of Objectives Appendix XXI: Measured Outcomes for Objectives,
2001 Appendix XVIII: Graduating Senior Survey |
||
|
4 |
The extent to which
each program objective is being met must be periodically assessed. |
Appendix IX: Annual Review, 2000 |
||
|
5 |
The results of the
program’s periodic assessments must be used to help identify opportunities
for program improvement. |
|||
|
6 |
The results of the
program’s assessments and the actions taken based on the results must be
documented. |
Section I-E: Program Evolution Section I-F: Program Current Status |
||
|
II |
Student
Support |
|
|
|
|
Intent |
Students can
complete the program in a reasonable amount of time. Students have ample
opportunity to interact with their instructors. Students are offered timely guidance and advice about the
program’s requirements and their career alternatives. Students who graduate the program meet all
program requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Has the Intent
of the category been met? |
|
|
|
|
|
Standards |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Courses
must be offered with sufficient frequency for students to complete the
program in a timely manner. |
|||
|
2 |
Computer science
courses must be structured to ensure effective interaction between
faculty/teaching assistants and students in lower division courses and
between faculty and students in upper division courses. |
|||
|
3 |
Guidance on how to
complete the program must be available to all students. |
|||
|
4 |
Students must have
access to qualified advising when they need to make course decisions and
career choices. |
|||
|
5 |
There must be
established standards and procedures to ensure that graduates meet the
requirements of the program. |
|||
|
III |
Faculty |
|
|
|
|
Intent |
Faculty members are
current and active in the discipline and have the necessary technical breadth
and depth to support a modern computer science program. There are enough
faculty members to provide continuity and stability, to cover the curriculum
reasonably, and to allow an appropriate mix of teaching and scholarly
activity. |
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Has the Intent
of the category been met? |
|
|
|
|
|
Standards |
|
|
|
|
1 |
There must be
enough full-time faculty members with primary commitment to the program to
provide continuity and stability. |
|||
|
2 |
Full-time faculty
members must oversee all course work. |
|||
|
3 |
Full-time faculty
members must cover most of the total classroom instruction. |
|||
|
4 |
The interests and
qualifications of the faculty members must be sufficient to teach the courses
and to plan and modify the courses and curriculum. |
Section III-D: Interests, Qualifications, Scholarly Contributions |
||
|
5 |
All faculty members
must remain current in the discipline. |
Section III-D: Interests, Qualifications, Scholarly Contributions |
||
|
6 |
All faculty members
must have a level of competence that would normally be obtained through
graduate work in computer science. |
Section III-D: Interests, Qualifications, Scholarly
Contributions |
||
|
7 |
Some full-time
faculty members must have a Ph.D. in computer science. |
Section III-D: Interests, Qualifications, Scholarly
Contributions |
||
|
8 |
All full-time
faculty members must have sufficient time for scholarly activities and
professional development. |
|||
|
9 |
Advising duties
must be a recognized part of faculty members’ workloads. |
|||
|
IV |
Curriculum |
|
|
|
|
Intent |
The curriculum is
consistent with the program's documented objectives. It combines technical requirements with
general education requirements and electives to prepare students for a
professional career in the computer field, for further study in computer science,
and for functioning in modern society.
The technical requirements include up-to-date coverage of basic and
advanced topics in computer science as well as an emphasis on science and
mathematics. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Has the Intent
of the category been met? |
|
|
|
|
|
Standards |
|
|
|
|
1 |
The curriculum must
include at least 40 semester hours of up-to-date study in computer science
topics. |
|||
|
2 |
The curriculum must
contain at least 30 semester hours of study in mathematics and science as
specified below under Mathematics and Science. |
|||
|
3 |
The curriculum must
include at least 30 semester hours of study in humanities, social sciences,
arts and other disciplines that serve to broaden the background of the
student. |
|||
|
4 |
The curriculum must
be consistent with the documented objectives of the program. |
|||
|
|
Computer
Science |
|
|
|
|
5 |
All students must
take a broad-based core of fundamental computer science material consisting
of at least 16 semester hours. |
|||
|
6 |
The core materials
must provide basic coverage of algorithms, data structures, software design,
concepts of programming languages, and computer organization and
architecture. |
Section IV-D: Course Requirements of Curriculum |
||
|
7 |
Theoretical
foundations, problem analysis, and solution design must be stressed within
the program’s core materials. |
Section IV-D: Course Requirements of Curriculum Appendix XIII: Degree-Plan Flowchart Appendix XV: Course Descriptions Appendix XVI: Course Descriptions for UTEP
CS Curriculum 2002 |
||
|
8 |
Students must be
exposed to a variety of programming languages and systems and must become
proficient in at least one higher-level language. |
|||
|
9 |
All students must
take at least 16 semester hours of advanced course work in computer science
that provides breadth and builds on the core to provide depth. |
|||
|
|
Mathematics and Science |
|
|
|
|
10 |
The curriculum must
include at least 15 semester hours of mathematics. |
|||
|
11 |
Course work in
mathematics must include discrete mathematics, differential and integral
calculus, and probability and statistics. |
|||
|
12 |
The curriculum must
include at least 12 semester hours of science. |
|||
|
13 |
Course work in
science must include the equivalent of a two-semester sequence in a
laboratory science for science or engineering majors. |
|||
|
14 |
Science course work
additional to that specified in Standard IV-13 must be in science courses or
courses that enhance the student's ability to apply the scientific method. |
|||
|
|
Additional Areas of Study |
|
|
|
|
15 |
The oral
communications skills of the student must be developed and applied in the
program. |
|||
|
16 |
The written
communications skills of the student must be developed and applied in the
program. |
|||
|
17 |
There must be
sufficient coverage of social and ethical implications of computing to give
students an understanding of a broad range of issues in this area. |
|||
|
V |
Laboratories
and Computing Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Intent |
Laboratories and
computing facilities are available, accessible, and adequately supported to
enable students to complete their course work and to support faculty teaching
needs and scholarly activities. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Has the Intent
of the category been met? |
|
|
|
|
|
Standards |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Each student must have
adequate and reasonable access to the systems needed for each course. |
Section V-A: Computer Facilities Available for Use in
Computer Science Programs |
||
|
2 |
Documentation for
hardware and software must be readily accessible to faculty and students. |
|||
|
3 |
All faculty members
must have access to adequate computing facilities for class preparation and
for scholarly activities. |
|||
|
4 |
There must be
adequate support personnel to install and maintain the laboratories and
computing facilities. |
|||
|
5 |
Instructional
assistance must be provided for the laboratories and computing facilities. |
|||
|
VI |
Institutional
Support and Financial Resources |
|
|
|
|
Intent |
The institution’s
support for the program and the financial resources available to the program
are sufficient to provide an environment in which the program can achieve its
objectives. Support and resources are
sufficient to provide assurance that the program will retain its strength
throughout the period of accreditation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Has the Intent
of the category been met? |
|
|
|
|
|
Standards |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Support for faculty
must be sufficient to enable the program to attract and retain high-quality
faculty capable of supporting the program’s objectives. |
|||
|
2 |
There must be
sufficient support and financial resources to allow all faculty members to
attend national technical meetings with sufficient frequency to maintain
competence as teachers and scholars. |
|||
|
3 |
There must be
support and recognition of scholarly activities. |
|||
|
4 |
There must be
office support consistent with the type of program, level of scholarly
activity, and needs of the faculty members. |
|||
|
5 |
Adequate time must
be assigned for the administration of the program. |
|||
|
6 |
Upper levels of
administration must provide the program with the resources and atmosphere to
function effectively with the rest of the institution. |
Section VI-E: Adequacy of Resources Section VI- F: Administrative Leadership |
||
|
7 |
Resources must be
provided to acquire and maintain laboratory facilities that meet the needs of
the program. |
|||
|
8 |
Resources must be
provided to support library and related information retrieval facilities that
meet the needs of the program. |
|||
|
9 |
There must be
evidence that the institutional support and financial resources will remain
in place throughout the period of accreditation. |
|||
|
VII |
Institutional
Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Intent |
Institutional
facilities including the library, other electronic information retrieval
systems, computer networks, classrooms, and offices are adequate to support
the objectives of the program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Has the Intent
of the category been met? |
|
|
|
|
|
Standards |
|
|
|
|
1 |
The library that
serves the computer science program must be adequately staffed with
professional librarians and support personnel. |
|||
|
2 |
The library’s
technical collection must include up-to-date textbooks, reference works, and
publications of professional and research organizations such as the ACM and
the IEEE Computer Society. |
|||
|
3 |
Systems for
locating and obtaining electronic information must be available. |
|||
|
4 |
Classrooms must be
adequately equipped for the courses taught. |
|||
|
5 |
Faculty offices
must be adequate to enable faculty members to meet their responsibilities to
students and for their professional needs. |
|||
Notes: A course
or one specific part of a course cannot be counted towards meeting more than
one of the quantitative criteria. Some of the topics in the computer science
segment could be covered in courses offered outside the academic unit that
administers the computer science program.
Route to csac@abet.org
with Short Form, Visit Report Forms, and Preliminary Statement.
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW
of the
COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM
submitted by
|
Institution |
|
July 2, 2001 |
|
Date |
to the
Computing
Accreditation Commission
for the
2001-2002
accreditation cycle
|
Primary contact:
|
David G. Novick, Chair |
||
|
|
|||
|
Telephone number: ______________________ FAX number: __________________ |
915-747-5480 |
FAX Number: |
915-747-5030 |
|
|
|||
|
Electronic mail: |
novick@utep.edu |
||
ABET
Computing Accreditation Commission
111 Market Place, Suite 1050
Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4012
Phone: 410-347-7700
Fax: 410-625-2238
e-mail: cac@abet.org
www: http://www.abet.org/
Form
Revised: December 28, 1999
Table of Contents
B. Implementation of
Objectives
A. Frequency of Course Offerings
E. Access to Qualified
Advising
B. Faculty with Primary
Commitment
D. Interests,
Qualifications, Scholarly Contributions
G. Information Regarding
Faculty Members
D. Course Requirements of
Curriculum
V.
Laboratories and Computing Facilities
A. Computer facilities
available for use in computer science programs
VI.
Institutional Support and Financial Resources
A. Attracting and Retaining
High Quality Faculty
B. Faculty Professional
Activities
D. Time Assigned for
Administration
G. Laboratory and Computing
Resources
I. Continuity of
Institutional Support
C. Adequacy of Faculty
Offices
Appendix I.
Information Relative to the Entire Institution
C. Regional or Institutional
Accreditation
F. Promotion and Faculty
Tenure
Appendix II.
General Information on the Unit Responsible for the Computer Science Program
E. Computer-Related
Undergraduate Degree Programs
A. Finances Related to the
Computer Science Program(s)
B. Operating and Computing
Expenditures
2.
Hardware/Software Expenditures
Appendix IV.
Computer Science Program Personnel
A. Term of appointment of
administrative head
B. Number of personnel
associated with program
1.
Consulting, Sponsored Research
Appendix V.
Computer Science Program Enrollment and Degree Data
Appendix VI.
Admission Requirements
Appendix
VII. Mission and Vision Statements
A. University of Texas at El
Paso
1. The
University of Texas at El Paso Vision
2. The
University of Texas at El Paso Mission
1. College
of Engineering Vision Statement
2. College
of Engineering Mission Statement
C. Department of Computer
Science
1. Vision of the Department of Computer
Science
2. Mission of the Department of Computer
Science
3. Objectives of Computer Science Department
Appendix
VIII. Measurable Outcomes for Objectives
Appendix IX
Annual Review, 2000
Appendix X.
Annual Review, 1999
Appendix XI.
Faculty Qualifications
Appendix
XII. Organization Chart
Appendix
XIII. Degree-Plan Flow Chart
Appendix
XIV. Prerequisites Flow Chart
Appendix XV.
Course Descriptions
Appendix
XVI. Course Descriptions for UTEP CS Curriculum 2002
Appendix
XVIII. Graduating Senior Survey
Appendix
XIX. Senior Exit Interviews
Appendix
XXI. Measured Outcomes for Objectives, 2001
Appendix
XXII. Department’s Process for Assessment
Appendix
XXIII. Core Hours Summary
INTENT: The program has documented, measurable objectives, including expected outcomes for graduates. The program regularly assesses its progress against its objectives and uses the results of the assessments to identify program improvements and to modify the program’s objectives.
The Intent must be met in order for a program to be deemed accreditable. One way to meet the Intent of this criterion is to satisfy each one of the Standards listed below. To do this, answer the questions associated with the Standards. If one or more Standards are not satisfied, it is incumbent upon the institution to demonstrate and document clearly and unequivocally how the Intent is met in some alternative fashion.
If you are having more than one program evaluated, particularly if the programs are on separate campuses, the answers to these questions may vary from one program to another. If this is the case, please use separate copies of this section for each program, and clearly delineate which program is being described.
Please attach items that support or precede the objectives, e.g.,
Ø mission statements from institution, college, department, program
· Mission and vision statements for the university: see Appendix VII
· Mission and vision statements for the college: see Appendix VII
· Mission and vision statements for the department: see Appendix VII
Ø plans (institution, college, department, etc.)
· University’s goals 2001-2005: see Appendix VII
· Annual Review 2000 of the department: see Appendix IX
Ø all objectives including student outcomes (itemize)
· Department’s educational, research and service objectives: see Appendix VII
· Department’s measurable outcomes for objectives: see Appendix VIII
Ø process for assessments
· Department’s process for assessments: see Appendix XXII
Ø who is involved in assessment and improvement?
· Department’s process for assessments: see Appendix XXII
Ø data from assessments
· Senior exit interviews, 2001: see Appendix XIX
· Measured outcomes for objectives, 2001: see Appendix XXI
Ø inputs from any supporting Office of Assessment
· Graduating senior survey, 2001: see Appendix XVIII
· Alumni survey: 2001: see Appendix XX
1. Indicate below or attach to this document your educational objectives for this program. These objectives must include expected outcomes for graduating students.
Appendix VII, “Mission and Vision Statements,” includes:
· Mission and vision statements for the university, the college and the department
· Educational objectives of the university and the department
Appendix IX, “Annual Review 2000” includes:
Student outcomes for the department’s objectives are presented in: