SSSS Annotation Notes July 15, 2013 For the training set: Annotator 1 was speaker 6. Atypically he did the annotations before the Annotators Guide was available, he's not a student, and he's not naive about information retrieval technology. Annotator 2 was speaker 1. Atypically he knows a lot about one technique of possible value for this task. Annotator 3 was speaker 28. Atypically she's not quite part of the CS community, being a math major, although she was taking a CS course and does IT work in her job. Annotator 4 was speaker 2. Atypically, she has experience doing search in audio archives, having spent about 10 hours doing so as part of the experiment reported in our Interspeech 2012 paper. Annotator 5 was speaker 30. Annotator 6 was speaker 5. Atypically, he is a member of the research lab, having joined a few months ago, and roughly knows our aims and favorite methods. For the testset: Annotator 1 was the same as annoator 3 for the testset. Annotators 2 and 3 were CS undergraduates. They worked at the the same table, and may have shared some thoughts on the tags. Annotator 4 was a high-school student. The most salient difference between the testset and trainingset tags was that there were many fewer long regions tagged in the testset. In the training set there was one region tagged over 4 minutes long (tv-shows), four more over 3 minutes (playing-video-games, programming-projects, movies-tv-shows, course-experiences), and 58 over two minutes. In the testset there were only 5 longer than 2 minutes, and these were all for just one category of one annotator. One reason for the difference is that we noticed the over-long tags in the training set, and suggested to the testset annotators that it was okay to leave large sections of the data without any tags, and that could be appropriate to break up a long region on a single vague topic (for example entertainment), into more specific contributions. Another possible factor is that, with only 6 conversations to work on, the testset annotators didn't suffer the same degree of desire to get it over quickly. in /home/users/nigel/papers/mediaeval/annotation-notes.txt