THEORY OF COMPUTATION
Syllabus for the course CS 5315/6315, Spring 2020

Class time: TR 1:30-2:50 pm, Room CCSB 1.0702

Instructor: Vladik Kreinovich, email vladik@utep.edu, office CCSB 3.0404, office phone (915) 747-6951

  • The instructor's office hours are:
  • If you want to come during the scheduled office hours, there is no need to schedule an appointment.
  • If you cannot come during the instructor's scheduled office hours, please schedule an appointment in the following way: He will then send a reply email, usually confirming that he is available at this time, and he will place the meeting with you on his schedule.

    Prerequisite: CS 3350 (Automata)

    Main Objectives:

    Contents

    1. Turing's snakelike machine: not very fancy, but it can compute anything (you just wait and wait and wait, ...). Finally: something purely theoretical (and not real machines): recursive functions. Church's bold statement: if anyone can compute anything on any machine, I can compute it on a Turing snake! Universal Turing machine. Can anyone really beat Church? We'll discuss the attempts (Gandi, Kreisel, etc) if time allows.
    2. You are accustomed to the fact that everything is computable, and if your program does not work, that means a bad grade. Finally! Only in this course! Computational problems that cannot be solved! (and so you get a bad grade, if your program solves them - just kidding).
    3. If a program requires a billion years to finish its computations, only a crazy theoretician can call it an algorithm. So, to sound more reasonable, we will talk about computational complexity, realistic (polynomial-time) computations, P and NP, NC, limitations on space and on the number of processors, etc. "P=NP?" as a challenge to mankind. Will science ever stop? Again, we will find here lots of undecidability results. And maybe, as a project, you will be able to prove that some problem that you were planning to solve is undecidable.
    4. What to do if your problem turned out to be undecidable? For sure: not to give up. It can be still decidable in some sense: for almost all cases, by a Monte-Carlo algorithm that gives an answer with probability close to 1, etc. Few results and lots of open problems.
    5. Turing machine was invented in the 30s, P=NP problem appeared when many of you guys were too young to count. What is the modern state of the Theory of Computation? We'll try to cover briefly:
      • parallelism,
      • algebraic computations,
      • computations with real data (including the idea of interval mathematics),
      • fuzzy algorithms,
      • neural computing,
      • chemical computing,
      • quantum computations, etc.

    Learning Outcomes

    1. Knowledge and Comprehension

    a. Describe the practical need for theory of computing: to know which computational problems are solvable and which are not, and which problems can be, in principle, solved within given computation time, to avoid wasting resources on trying to solve problems in such a general context that they become unsolvable

    b. Describe different models of computing, including recursive functions, different versions of Turing machine, etc.

    c. Describe how computability in a programming language is related to formal models of computing, on the example of primitive recursive and recursive functions

    d. Understand Church-Turing thesis and understand the status of this thesis - that it is, in effect, a statement about the physical world

    e. Define decidable and recursively enumerable (r.e., semi-decidable) sets

    f. Understand the notion of an oracle and of computing relative to an oracle

    g. Define classes P, NP, the notions of polynomial time reduction, NP-hardness, and NP-completeness; understand the motivations behind these definitions: P means feasible, NP stands for a problem; understand the difference between the formal notion of polynomial time and the practical notion of feasibility

    i. Understand the difference between a proof and a sequence of reasonable arguments which does not constitute a proof

    j. Know several NP-hard problems

    k. Define complexity classes from the absolute and relative polynomial hierarchy; give examples of problems

    l. Understand the main idea of parallelization

    m. Define the class NC of parallelizable P problems, know the relation between NC and P, and an example of a P-complete problem

    n. Understand the difference between the formal computation time of a parallel program and the actual time which takes communication time into account

    o. Define Kolmogorov complexity, understand motivations behind this definition

    p. Be aware of the main ideas behind different physical schemes of computing beyond traditional Turing machines, such as quantum computing

    2. Application and Analysis

    a. Trace the computation of a primitive recursive or recursive function on a numerical example

    b. Translate a formal description of a primitive recursive or recursive function into a program

    c. Trace a Turing machine on a given input

    d. Prove that satisfiability is NP-hard, and that one more problem is NP-hard

    e. Know how to parallelize standard simple parallelizable algorithms (e.g., search, or dot product of two vectors)

    f. Use the definition of Kolmogorov complexity K(x) to provide reasonable upper bounds for K(x) of a given string x

    3. Synthesis and Evaluation

    a. Prove, from the definition, that a given function (e.g., a given polynomial or propositional function) is primitive recursive or recursive

    b. Design a Turing machine that computes a given function

    c. Synthesize Turing machines that compute two functions into a Turing machine for computing their composition

    d. Prove that not every problem is computable - e.g., that the halting problem is undecidable

    e. Apply diagonalization to prove results similar to what we had in class

    f. Prove that given simple sets are decidable and/or r.e.

    g. Prove that the union, intersection, and complement of decidable sets are decidable

    h. Prove that the union and intersection of r.e. sets is r.e.; prove that the complement to a r.e. set is not always r.e.

    i. Prove that not every r.e. set is decidable and that not every set is r.e.

    j. Prove, for a given software requirement, it is algorithmically impossible to check whether a given program satisfies this requirement

    k. For problems similar to ones considered in class, prove their NP-hardness

    l. Be able to parallelize simple algorithms

    m. Be able to understand and present a research paper in Theory of Computing - with a minor help from a professor

    Main Source: Michael Sipser, Introduction to the Theory of Computation, PWS Publishing Co., 2nd or later edition

    Projects: An important part of the class is a project. There are three possible types of projects:

    A project can be: The most important aspect of the project is that it should be useful and/or interesting to you. The instructor can assign a project to you, there are plenty of potential projects, but if each student selects a project that he or she likes, this will be much much better for everyone.

    Tests: There will be three tests, on February 20, on March 31, and on April 30, and the final exam on May 14, 1-3:45 pm.

    Grades: Each topic means home assignments (mainly on the sheets of paper, but some on the real computer). Some of them may be graded. Maximum number of points:

    (smart projects with ideas that can turn into a serious scientific publication get up to 40 points).

    A good project can help but it cannot completely cover possible deficiencies of knowledge as shown on the test and on the homeworks. In general, up to 80 points come from tests and home assignments. So:

    Special Accommodations: If you have a disability and need classroom accommodations, please contact the Center for Accommodations and Support Services (CASS) at 747-5148 or by email to cass@utep.edu, or visit their office located in UTEP Union East, Room 106. For additional information, please visit the CASS website at http://www.sa.utep.edu/cass. CASS's staff are the only individuals who can validate and if need be, authorize accommodations for students.

    Scholastic Dishonesty: Any student who commits an act of scholastic dishonesty is subject to discipline. Scholastic dishonesty includes, but not limited to cheating, plagiarism, collusion, submission for credit of any work or materials that are attributable to another person.

    Cheating is:

    Plagiarism is: To avoid plagiarism see: https://www.utep.edu/student-affairs/osccr/_Files/docs/Avoiding-Plagiarism.pdf

    Collusion is unauthorized collaboration with another person in preparing academic assignments.

    Instructors are required to -- and will -- report academic dishonesty and any other violation of the Standards of Conduct to the Dean of Students.

    NOTE: When in doubt on any of the above, please contact your instructor to check if you are following authorized procedure.

    See You All in the Class!